One Damn Slide After Another Power.Point at Every Occasion for Speech Computational Culture.Introduction.Power.We provide excellent essay writing service 247.Enjoy proficient essay writing and custom writing services provided by professional academic writers.Point is installed on more than a billion computers.It is the indispensable medium for presentation, one of the most ubiquitous software applications in the world.It has likely been used to raise more money than any other tool in history.Teachers rely on Power.Point.Elementary schoolchildren make presentations and so do researchers in the sciences, arts, and humanities.Sunday sermons are increasingly delivered with slideware just as press conferences, trials, and military briefings have also become occasions for slides.They say the president of the United States sees Power.Point presentations in the situation room.Figure 1.Power. Point in church on Easter Sunday, 2.Seldom if ever has a commercial device exercised such dominance on the principal forms of public speech.For more than twenty five years Power.Point has shown up at lectures, events, talks, sermons, and briefings.What once were distinct occasions have now become formatted in the genre of the commercial demonstration.Power.Point provides a common infrastructure, a template for the organization of speech, and for the logic of argumentation.Noregistration upload of files up to 250MB.Not available in some countries.Questions and Answers from the Community.Looking for questions to answer Try browsing to a category you like, and then click the Unanswered link upper left.A remix is a piece of media which has been altered from its original state by adding, removing, andor changing pieces of the item.A song, piece of artwork, book.D4%DA%20Lenov03473292/%B4%AE%BF%DA%B2%D9%D7%F7%B9%FD%B3%CC%CD%BC%C6%AC/%D0%C2%BD%A8%CE%C4%BC%FE%BC%D0/1__.jpg' alt='Serial Port Communication Example Visual Culture' title='Serial Port Communication Example Visual Culture' />As such, it shapes and produces the world.Ehome Infrared Transceiver Driver Windows 8 .Nevertheless, the application has been almost entirely unremarked upon by critical scholars of media, technology, and the digital humanities.Why Despite extraordinary claims about the total domination of algorithms, protocols, the digital, bits, and information, the material conditions of mundane software use go largely under recognized as key sites for cultural work.Where, for example are the books about tax software, bug databases, or personal calendaring applications Perhaps the omission is part of a larger failure to enact an everyday turn.Perhaps it is simply hard to see the forest for the trees.This essay critically contextualizes Power.Point.We argue that many of the stylistic conventions associated with slideware have long been part of business communications.Personal computing, however, scaled up the production of presentations.Doing so linked knowledge work with personal expression.The result has been the rise of presentation culture.In an information society, nearly everyone presents.Analyzing presentation software makes visible the largely under appreciated reliance on performative authority in knowledge production.By inadvertently privileging the relationships between personal computing and networked forms of sociality, cultural analysts have missed the ways personal computing transformed public culture, the ways software reconfigured the conditions of collective life.Engaging with such reconfigurations requires taking software and its extended materiality seriously.The essay concludes with a discussion of alternative presentation machineries.If we, as humanists, are to imagine futures with computational tools we will need to critically analyze and design forms of intellectual middleware that materialize relationships between methods of interpretation, data objects, and tools.We will need to ask questions like How does Power.Point think and how would we like presentation software to thinkPower.Point Does it Suck or is it Evil Power.Point, initially known as Presenter, was created by a Silicon Valley startup called Forethought Inc.Founded in 1.Eighteen months later, with no viable product, the founders initiated a corporate restart.In 1.Forethought shipped Presenter.The company sold its first 1.Microsoft then purchased the company for 1.By 1.Power.Point dominated market share and was more profitable than the software industry as an aggregated whole.Despite a range of competing software packages over the years e.Pixie, Harvard Graphics, Cricket Presents, Keynote, and Prezi Power.Point has long been the dominant player and its interaction paradigm has remained effectively the same.Users build one slide at a time and control overall order and formatting via outline, slide sorter, and master slide views.The software presumes that presentations are constructed on personal computers with single screens and local repositories.In 1.Power. Points constancy is curious in two respects.Digital media have radically scaled up in the past twenty five years.In the 1.Today repositories of hundreds of thousands of high resolution images are common as are computing devices that support multiple screens.That presentations have remained unchanged in spite of transformations in media content and distribution is in and of itself rather striking.More striking is how dramatically public reception shifted given nothing really changed.For more than a decade Power.Point was a darling of the software industry.Then in the 2.High tech CEOs like IBMs Lou Gerstner, Apples Steve Jobs, and Sun Microsystems Scott Mc.Nealy started blaming organizational inefficiency on the software and even banned its use.Director of Research Peter Norvigs spoofed Gettysburg Address a la Power.Points Auto.Content Wizard, for example, became Internet famous.Figure 2.The Gettysburg Address as Power.Point presentation.Particularly striking were the critical voices emerging from the armed forces.Presentation technologies like overhead transparencies, whiteboards, wall charts, and photographic slides have long been part of military culture but Power.Point, it seemed, ruined briefings.Military commanders sounded like critical cultural analysts as they warned the public about the dangers of decontextualized statements, the conferral of false authority on dubious knowledge, the risks of misrepresentation inherent in software visualizations.Officers reported devoting at least an hour per day to slide making and commanders worried as the program became deeply embedded in a military culture that has come to rely on Power.Points hierarchical ordering of a confused world.Perhaps the concerns about jazzy but often incoherent visuals were displacements of deeper critiques of the Bush regime, a way of expressing a distaste for aesthetics in place of voicing fears that public life hinged on the illusion of perfect mastery despite chaos and uncertainty.In a widely circulated 2.New York Times article General Stanley Mc.Chrystal explicitly linked strategic failures in Afghanistan to poor presentation visuals quipping, When we understand that slide, well have won the war.Figure 3.Power. Point slide depicting United States military strategy in Afghanistan.In a 2.Slate article US Air Force historian Edward Mark voiced concerns that almost all Air Force documents today, for example, are presented as Power.Point briefings.They are almost never printed and rarely stored.When they are saved, they are often unaccompanied by any text.As a resultbriefings are incomprehensible.Commanders warned that distinctions between reporting, decision making, and archiving were blurring.The decontextualization of military actions reduced war to just a targeting exercise, creating the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control, and keeping people from taking into account political, economic, and ethnic forces.Phrases like death by Power.Point and hypnotizing chickens entered the vernacular, describing the numbing sensation accompanying slide briefings and the purposeful subjecting of crowds to presentations that lulled their critical faculties to sleep.No one gained as much mileage out of critiquing Power.Point as Edward Tufte.The maven of lucid visualizations charged the program with destroying the capacity for sustained, critical thought.Power.Point stacks information in time, forcing audiences to think sequentially rather than comparatively.Visual reading works more effectively when relevant information is shown side by side.Often the more intense the detail, the greater the clarity and understanding.Power. How To Find Cracked Software Website more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |